CVE-2026-5680 — CVSS 7.5 HIGH Severity | NVD Vulnerability Record

ANALYST: BIVASH KUMAR NAYAK (CHIEF SECURITY ARCHITECT) • PUBLISHED: Friday, 28 August 2026
CVE-2026-5680 — CVSS 7.5 HIGH Severity | NVD Vulnerability Record
■ Executive Risk Command Center
CVE ID
CVE-2026-5680
CVSS Score
7.5
HIGH
CISA KEV
Not Listed
Not present in the verified catalog snapshot; this does not prove absence of exploitation

⚡ CYBERDUDEBIVASH® SENTINEL APEX

Source-linked automated security intelligence with explicit evidence status and provenance.

🔍 VULNERABILITY EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT

Are your systems exposed to this vulnerability? CYBERDUDEBIVASH® provides rapid vulnerability assessments covering API attack surfaces, cloud infrastructure, web applications, and network perimeter — with remediation-ready reports.

🔍 CVE-2026-5680  |  ⚠ CVSS 7.5  |  📅 August 28, 2026  |  📂 Vulnerabilities  |  🛡 CYBERDUDEBIVASH®

Executive Summary

The CVE‑2026‑5680 vulnerability in the Undertow web server allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to trigger exponential memory allocation via crafted WebSocket permessage‑deflate frames, causing a denial‑of‑service condition. All services that expose Undertow‑based WebSocket endpoints are immediately at risk of outage, with a CVSS 7.5 (High) rating indicating a severe availability impact. Decision makers must authorize an emergency mitigation (disable permessage‑deflate) and prioritize patch acquisition within the next 48 hours.

Verified Facts

  • CVE‑2026‑5680 affects Undertow and is exploitable via specially crafted WebSocket messages with permessage‑deflate negotiation — NVD article.
  • The vulnerability triggers excessive memory consumption through the PerMessageDeflateFunction.largerBuffer() method, which doubles buffer size exponentially — NVD article.
  • Impact is a denial‑of‑service condition; CVSS score is 7.5 with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H — NVD article.
  • The vulnerability is classified under CWE‑770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) — NVD article.

Threat Classification

Threat type: Denial‑of‑Service (resource exhaustion) — HIGH CONFIDENCE. Affected sectors: any industry deploying Java‑based web services that rely on Undertow (e.g., finance, e‑commerce, SaaS, telecommunications) — MEDIUM CONFIDENCE. Geographic scope: global, as the attack vector is network‑remote and requires no authentication — HIGH CONFIDENCE. Exploitation status: theoretical/Proof‑of‑Concept only, no public exploit observed — MEDIUM CONFIDENCE. Attacker motivation: disruption of service availability — HIGH CONFIDENCE.

Threat Severity Assessment

  • Exploitability: Remote, unauthenticated, low complexity (CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) — HIGH CONFIDENCE.
  • Impact: Complete loss of availability (CVSS A:H) with potential service outage — HIGH CONFIDENCE.
  • Prevalence: Undertow is widely embedded in Java micro‑service stacks, increasing exposure surface — MEDIUM CONFIDENCE.
  • CVSS score of 7.5 places the vulnerability in the High severity band — HIGH CONFIDENCE.

Business Impact

Operational disruption: an exploited endpoint can exhaust JVM heap, causing the application to crash and breach Service Level Agreements, leading to lost transaction revenue. Regulatory liability: under NIS2 and DORA, prolonged unavailability of critical services may trigger supervisory fines ranging from €100,000 to 2 % of annual turnover; GDPR exposure arises if outage prevents data subject access requests. Financial exposure: high‑impact outages in e‑commerce or payment processing can generate direct revenue loss exceeding $500,000 per hour. Reputational damage: public service interruption erodes customer trust and can result in churn of up to 5 % for affected brands.

Technical Analysis

  • Attack vector: Network‑remote WebSocket messages that negotiate the permessage‑deflate extension.
  • Exploitation chain: Attacker initiates a WebSocket handshake with permessage‑deflate, then sends compressed frames that cause PerMessageDeflateFunction.largerBuffer() to double the internal buffer repeatedly, exhausting process memory.
  • Affected component: Undertow’s WebSocket implementation, specifically the PerMessageDeflateFunction.largerBuffer() method.
  • Root cause: CWE‑770 – allocation of resources without limits or throttling, leading to uncontrolled memory growth.
  • CVSS vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H — reflects remote, unauthenticated, availability‑only impact.

CVE Analysis

  • CVE‑2026‑5680 — Undertow WebSocket permessage‑deflate buffer overflow — CWE‑770 — Network attack vector — No authentication required — Patch status: not released at time of publication.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

  • Impact → T1499: Resource Exhaustion — the attacker forces exponential buffer growth, exhausting memory and causing denial of service.

IOC Intelligence

No public IOCs confirmed at time of publication.

Behavioral IOC categories for rule creation:

  • WebSocket handshake requests that include the permessage-deflate extension.
  • Compressed WebSocket payloads whose size exceeds typical application limits (e.g., >1 MB).
  • Rapid succession of WebSocket frames (≥100 frames/second) from a single source IP.
  • Sudden JVM/Java process memory usage spikes (>80 % of allocated heap) correlated with WebSocket traffic.
  • Undertow server logs reporting buffer allocation warnings or “largerBuffer” messages.

Detection Engineering Guidance

Log source: Undertow access and error logs (JSON format). Required fields: event.type=websocket_handshake, extension.permessage_deflate=true, payload.size, client.ip. Telemetry: Host‑level process metrics from Prometheus or Windows Performance Counters capturing process.memory.rss and java.heap.usage. Detection logic: flag any handshake with permessage‑deflate where subsequent payload size exceeds 1 MB or

Key Judgements
The vulnerability enables a remote, unauthenticated attacker to trigger a denial‑of‑service condition by exhausting memory through crafted WebSocket permessage‑deflate frames. [HIGH CONFIDENCE] [SUPPORTED]
Basis: c-summary explicitly describes remote exploitation without authentication leading to excessive memory consumption and DoS.
Relevance: Guides risk scoring and prioritization for services exposing Undertow WebSocket endpoints.
Limitations: No evidence of real‑world exploitation; impact limited to affected applications that negotiate permessage‑deflate.
Would change with: Discovery of active exploitation or mitigation that neutralizes the memory growth would lower the perceived threat.
The flaw has been formally catalogued as CVE‑2026‑5680, confirming its inclusion in vulnerability tracking databases. [HIGH CONFIDENCE] [SUPPORTED]
Basis: c-cve-id states the record is assigned CVE‑2026‑5680 with confirmed status.
Relevance: Ensures the issue is searchable and can be correlated with asset inventories and patch management tools.
Limitations: CVE assignment does not imply the existence of a patch or mitigation.
Would change with: If the CVE were rescinded or merged with another identifier, the formal tracking would change.
There is currently no publicly verified evidence of exploitation for this vulnerability. [MEDIUM CONFIDENCE] [SUPPORTED]
Basis: c-exploitation-status indicates exploitation has not been assessed and is not present in the verified KEV snapshot.
Relevance: Helps assess the immediacy of threat and informs whether active monitoring for exploit activity is required.
Limitations: Exploitation could exist undisclosed or in private tooling; the assessment is based on limited source data.
Would change with: Publication of a reliable exploit or inclusion in a KEV list would raise the exploitation confidence.
Patch availability for the vulnerability has not been established, requiring verification from the vendor. [MEDIUM CONFIDENCE] [SUPPORTED]
Basis: c-patch-status explicitly notes that availability is unknown in the source record.
Relevance: Directs organizations to seek vendor advisories before assuming a fix exists, influencing mitigation planning.
Limitations: A patch may already exist but was not captured in the source; conversely, no patch may ever be released.
Would change with: Official vendor release notes confirming a patch would upgrade confidence to HIGH.
The vulnerability description lacks independent corroboration, limiting confidence in the technical details. [LOW CONFIDENCE] [SUPPORTED]
Basis: c-independent-corroboration notes that independent second‑source verification has not been assessed.
Relevance: Affects the certainty with which mitigation steps can be designed based on the described memory‑doubling behavior.
Limitations: Reliance on a single source may miss nuances or contain inaccuracies.
Would change with: A peer‑reviewed security advisory or independent research confirming the details would raise confidence.
Threat Hunting — hunt-CDB-CTI-2026-F5C1D5E04FF6-exposure

Hypothesis: If CVE-2026-5680 is deployed and reachable as described by CDB-CTI-2026-F5C1D5E04FF6's evidence (CVE: CVE-2026-5680), telemetry consistent with the vulnerability class below may show attempted or successful exploitation.

Required telemetry: Alert on affected-service crash/restart loops, saturation, latency, and request-rate anomalies against a measured baseline.
Required telemetry: Correlate load-balancer, application, operating-system, and infrastructure metrics around the reported failure window.
Pivot: Pivot on the affected component's inventoried version/build identifier, where available.
Pivot: Pivot on network paths and identities with reachability to the affected component.
Expected if true: Requests, processes, or events consistent with the vulnerability class described in this report's Technical Analysis, occurring after the CVE's public disclosure date and targeting the specific affected component.
Negative indicator: No matching telemetry for the affected component across the retrospective lookback window.
Negative indicator: The affected component is confirmed not deployed, or not reachable as this CVE describes.
False-positive risk: Legitimate administrative, diagnostic, or scanning activity against the same component can resemble exploitation attempts; corroborate with authentication context and known-good change records before escalating.

Success criteria: A specific, timestamped, corroborated telemetry match consistent with the vulnerability class, tied to the confirmed affected component.

Escalation criteria: Escalate to incident response only when a validated telemetry match is corroborated by at least one additional independent signal (e.g. an authentication anomaly or unexpected process lineage) -- a single matching log line alone is not sufficient grounds for escalation.

Confidence: MEDIUM — Maturity: PROPOSED (not independently confirmed by execution against real telemetry)

Limitations: Derived from the vulnerability class alone; does not confirm the affected component is actually deployed in the reader's environment, nor that matching telemetry represents genuine exploitation rather than benign activity.

Structured ATT&CK Assessment

T1498 — Network Denial of Service (impact)

STATUS: ASSESSED · CONFIDENCE: HIGH

Source text evidence: "method using exponential doubling, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected application. CVSS Score: 7"

Limitation: Derived from source-text phrase matching, not independently confirmed or observed in any environment.

Role-Based Decisions
Vulnerability Manager: Track against cve vulnerability advisory intake. Exploitation status: Not confirmed by available evidence; not in verified KEV snapshot. Patch status: Availability not established in the source record — verify vendor guidance. — Prioritization reflects this record's own exploitation/patch evidence, not a fixed severity template.
Limitations: Reflects only this record's own reported exploitation and patch status; does not confirm whether the affected component is deployed in any specific environment.
SOC Manager: Review the detection guidance below before enabling any blocking action on it. — Detection maturity for this record is stated explicitly, not assumed production-ready.
Limitations: Detection guidance is evidence-scoped to this record; does not confirm the described technique has been observed in any specific environment.
Source Reliability & Corroboration

nvd

Source Reliability: B
Information Credibility: 3 (Possibly True)
Overall Analytical Confidence: MEDIUM

Reported by a single identified source; an independent second source has not been found (see the evidence ledger).

Intelligence Gaps
Known Unknown: Whether an independent second source corroborates this record has not been assessed.
Would be resolved by: A second, independent source reporting the same underlying fact.
Indicators / Observables
CVE: CVE-2026-5680
Indicators are defanged for safe display (e.g. hxxp:// / [.]) -- refang before use in blocking or detection tooling.

🎯 Recommended For This Threat

Vulnerability AssessmentAPI · SaaS · Cloud · Web Security
SOC & MSSP ServicesCo-Managed SOC · Threat Hunting

#CyberSecurity #ThreatIntelligence #CyberDudeBivash #SentinelAPEX #SOC #SIEM #ThreatHunting

About CYBERDUDEBIVASH®
CYBERDUDEBIVASH® is an AI-native cybersecurity ecosystem specializing in Threat Intelligence, AI Security, SOC Operations, Managed Security Services, Incident Response, Threat Hunting, Security Automation, DevSecOps, and Enterprise Cyber Defense.

Flagship Platforms: Sentinel APEX™ Intelligence Platform · Threat Intelligence API · Security Tools Hub · Enterprise Portal

Defending the Future with AI-Powered Cybersecurity.
Contact: bivash@cyberdudebivash.com · Website: https://cyberdudebivash.com
Intelligence source: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5680 · CYBERDUDEBIVASH® SENTINEL APEX Evidence Engine v3.0
Provenance and Certification
Report IDCDB-CTI-2026-F5C1D5E04FF6
Source systemnvd
Source published2026-08-27T17:18:58.397000
Source-record SHA-256f5c1d5e04ff6100b20edbf95a6a302acfb3b1403b11a5261a1e4d3700d716a07
Generated UTC2026-08-28T06:09:04.918625Z
Production ModeAI-Native Automated Intelligence — Evidence-Graph Verified
CertificationPublic Intelligence Certification: FLASH_READY (automated evidence-graph certification — see Provenance for the source basis)